Perhaps I should wait one more week before naming my 5 Heisman finalists, as several contenders still have key games left to play.
Eh, I'll live on the edge.
#5, Ray Rice, Rutgers: The diminutive 19-year-old sophomore has logged 1388 yards and 16 TDs for the Rutgers Scarlet Knights, one of the nation's true Cinderella stories. With a trip to Morgantown still on the schedule, Rice has a legitimate shot to surpass the impressive 1500-yard mark (especially in light of the Mountaineers' disastrous performance against South Florida). Many critics will argue that Rice's reputation has been excessively bolstered by the sentimentality surrounding Rutgers' magical season. To those folks I say, Show the Scarlet Knights some love! Who knew that the State University of New Jersey even had a Big East football program? Rice (in tandem with a great coach and hard-working teammates) helped vault this program from practical anonymity all the way to the BCS precipice. Performances of note include: 23-108-1TD in a 33-0 shellacking of Illinois, 39-225-1TD in a win at Pittsburgh, and 22-131-2TD in a historic defeat of Louisville. If Rice goes into Morgantown and puts forth a solid effort, then it'll be hard to deny him a trip to New York.
#4, Steve Slaton, West Virginia: With one game still to play, Slaton will likely finish the season with more than 2,000 all-purpose yards and almost 20 TDs. He and hot-footed quarterback Pat White are the nation's top one-two rushing combo, which makes it no surprise that the Mountaineers have scored at least 34 points in all but two games this season. Without a doubt, West Virginia fields as potent an offense as any team in the country; Slaton, with his 7.7 yards-per-carry average, is its primary catalyst. Notable games: 21-195-2TD against Maryland (victory), 18-156-1TD at Louisville (loss), and 23-215-2TD in a win at Pittsburgh.
#3, Brady Quinn, Notre Dame: Quinn finished the '06 campaign with a staggering 35 TD passes against only 5 interceptions, 3 of which came in one game that he'd like to forget--a humbling 47-21 home loss to Michigan. After that defeat, he went on a torrid nine-game streak, posting 29 touchdown passes against only a pair of picks, and leading the Irish to an overall mark of 10-2. With four years as the QB of a newly resurgent high-profile team under his belt, Brady (no, not that Brady) appears poised to be christened the NFL's next Golden Boy. Don't be surprised to hear his name called before all others on draft day.
#2, Darren McFadden, Arkansas: Arguably the most valuable and versatile back in all of college football, Darren McFadden has led the Razorbacks to a surprising berth in the SEC Championship Game. In addition to compiling 1400+ yards and 14 rushing TDs, McFadden has helped to throw (quite literally) a unique twist into the Arkansas offense, often lining up at quarterback in the so-called "Wildcat" formation. 5-5 with 2TD passes--not bad, huh? McFadden helped run the Razorbacks to the brink of a national title shot, and he clearly deserves a spot on the Heisman stage, especially if the Hogs defeat Florida and earn the right to represent the nation's toughest conference in a BCS bowl. Impressive performances: 145 yards in an enormous win at Auburn, 219 yards-2TD in a road victory against the Gamecocks, and 21-182-2TD in a nail-biting loss to LSU.
And now, the winner...
#1, Troy Smith, Ohio State: 30 touchdown passes. 5 interceptions. Quarterback ratings of 177.7 and 162.8 against #2 Texas and #2 Michigan, respectively. (And yes, that 24-7 victory over the 'Horns took place in Austin.) Whilst steering the ship for the clear-cut #1 team in the nation, Smith has shown little sign of running aground. Look for him to contribute a performance of (Vince) Young-like proportions in the BCS Championship Game, and for Ohio State to defeat whomever their opponent may be. Also, rest assured that Troy Smith's name will grace this year's Heisman Trophy.
Honorable Mentions: Colt Brennan, QB, Hawaii (72% comp./4,589 yards/51 TD passes); Ian Johnson, RB, Boise State (1600+ yards and 24 TDs for an undefeated, BCS-busting Bronco team, including a monstrous 22-240-5TD effort in a 42-14 thumping of the Trojan-slaying Oregon State Beavers); Mike Hart, RB, Michigan (1500+ yards and 14 TDs for a team whose only loss came in an epic 42-39 showdown in Columbus, a game in which Hart carried the ball 23 times for 142 yards and 3 touchdowns)
11.25.2006
11.24.2006
Weekend Forecast (EPL, NFL)
EPL
Charlton v. Everton: Everton, while currently in 7th spot, trail 3rd-place Portsmouth by a mere three points. With impact players like Andy Johnson and Tim Cahill, the Toffees certainly know how to net their share of goals. Charlton, on the other hand, currently sit at the bottom of the table. With only eight points earned from thirteen matches, the Addicks are in need of a momentum-changing victory.
[2-0, Everton]
Aston Villa v. Middlesbrough: Disappointing Middlesbrough, who have yet to notch a victory on the road this season, must travel to Villa Park, where the home men have ceded only three goals in six games (4-2-0). Though they currently sit 5th in the table, Villa have lost only once in 13 overall matches (5-7-1). If they can develop a knockout punch, Martin O'neill's squad may well be a legitimate factor in the race for Champion's League spots.
[1-0, Villa]
Fulham v. Reading: Newly promoted (and surprising) Reading currently sit 8th, though they trail 4th-place Arsenal by only three points. Perennial middle-meddlers Fulham are hoping to correct the disappointing form shown in last week's 3-1 loss against Manchester City. Most notable about this game is that each team features a member of the U.S. national team! It's McBride v. Convey!
[1-1, draw]
Liverpool v. Manchester City: Perhaps second to Newcastle in terms of general disappointment, Liverpool boast an embarrassing 0-2-5 road mark, having scored only a single goal in those seven away matches. City hold an equally dismal 0-1-5 road record, having surrendered a league-worst 14 away goals. This week's match-up is at Ansfield, which surely gives Liverpool the edge. Still, Rafa Benitez must find a way to win on the road if Liverpool are to have any chance of rescuing their season. Such poor play is hardly becoming of a recent European Champion.
[2-1, Liverpool]
West Ham v. Sheffield United: Fortunately for struggling West Ham, Sheffield must travel to Upton Park. The EPL newcomers have yet to claw their way out of the relegation zone, having managed only a pair of wins thus far. Things, however, look equally bleak for West Ham. Invigorated by high-profile signings including Argentinian star Carlos Tevez, the Hammers surely figured to be far more than one point clear of the relegation zone at this juncture in the season. Alan Pardew has his work cut out for him.
[1-0, West Ham]
Bolton v. Arsenal: Expect the Gunners to ride into the Reebok Stadium on a wave of midweek Champion's League momentum. Currently 4th in the table, Arsenal must soon show whether they have what it takes to shake up the two-team race between Man. U. and Chelsea.
[3-1, Arsenal]
Newcastle v. Portsmouth: Portsmouth began the season as a fantasy owner's dream, led by scoring machine Kanu and a staunch defense anchored by rejuvenated stars David James and Sol Campbell. Although Pompey are beginning to "come back to Earth," they needn't worry about "Most Disappointing Team" front-runner Newcastle. Parker, Martins, Duff, and company have done little of note, posting a lowly eight goals in 13 matches played.
[2-0, Portsmouth]
Tottenham v. Wigan: Fresh off a season in which they impressively retained their top-flight status, Wigan are currently riding a five-match unbeaten streak, highlighted by back-to-back road victories against Fulham and Bolton. Spurs, ever the yearly pick for "Next Big Team," stand poised to star in A Tale of Two Seasons: 4-1-1 at home, 0-3-4 on the road. Look for Tottenham to try to find their goal-scoring touch this weekend at White Hart Lane.
[2-1, Tottenham]
Manchester United v. Chelsea: This is the first of what are sure to be a pair of vitally important clashes between the EPL's top two teams. While each club has suffered only a single Premiership loss, both experienced midweek 1-0 defeats in Champion's League group play (United against Celtic, Chelsea against Werder Bremen). Make no mistake: neither Sir Alex Ferguson nor Jose Mourinho will allow his team to enter this match with a hangover. Ferguson's Red Devils hungrily wish to puncture the aura that surrounds the defending champs, while Mourinho's men look to reiterate their intentions of retaining the EPL crown. It's "we're back" versus "we ain't going nowhere."
[2-2, draw]
NFL
Cincinatti v. Cleveland: While the Bengals stand at a disappointing 5-5, they remain 5th in the NFL in points scored. Indeed, Carson Palmer and crew can score with the best of 'em. Following a big win in New Orleans, the Bengals need to continue to improve their defense while remaining strong as ever on the offensive side. The Browns, on the other hand, are...the Browns. Despite my previous praise of their uniforms--and despite the fact that Braylon Edwards is becoming a stud--Cleveland is still Cleveland.
[31-10, Cincinatti]
Jacksonville v. Buffalo: The Jaguars are the NFL's most perplexing team, boasting wins over the Giants, Eagles, and Cowboys, while recording losses to the Redskins and Texans (twice). The Bills continue to ebb and flow, though they have won two of their last three games, with the one loss being a 17-16 heartbreaker against the then-undefeated Colts. In a game between two inconsistent teams such as Jacksonville and Buffalo, home-field advantage generally sways things. Look for the Bills to inch closer to the .500 mark.
[17-14, Buffalo]
Pittsburgh v. Baltimore: The wheels of the Big Ben Bandwagon have fallen off, and memories of Super Bowl XXXV are alive in Baltimore. With two difficult road games (at Cincinatti and at Kansas City) upcoming, expect Baltimore to pounce upon the defending champs in this tune-up.
[28-10, Baltimore]
New Orleans v. Atlanta: Drew Brees, coming off of a 510-yard losing performance against the Bengals, takes his Big Easy aerial attack to the Georgia Dome to meet the Falcons, losers of three straight. Meanwhile, Michael Vick will surely be looking to set his critics (including Jim Mora Sr.) straight. Each of these teams has played in its share of shootouts this season, so don't expect to see a great deal of defense in this one. Give the edge to the Saints, who won the first go-'round 23-3.
[34-24, New Orleans]
Carolina v. Washington: The Panthers are beginning to look, if only somewhat, like a team who could at least challenge for the NFC's Super Bowl spot. So long as they have a healthy Steve Smith and a decently effective running game, Carolina stands a chance to beat anyone they play. The Redskins, conversely, are...bad. The generous 4.5-point line presumably entails a small measure of home-field momentum for Washington. Heh...
[28-10, Carolina]
San Francisco v. St. Louis: Hold the presses! The 49ers sit in 2nd place in the NFC West, only one game behind defending conference champs Seattle. Despite fielding the league's second-worst scoring defense, the Niners have inched their way to a 5-5 record. Lo and behold, what better chance to break the .500 barrier than to face the freefalling Rams? (Granted, "freefalling" may be too harsh a term, as St. Louis is coming off of a difficult stretch--Seattle (twice), San Diego, Kansas City, and Carolina.) Still, all were losses, and San Francisco will try to strike while the iron is hot, using a healthy dose of Frank Gore to open up the passing game for a much-improved Alex Smith. Don't be surprised if they pull off an upset on the road.
[24-20, San Francisco]
Arizona v. Minnesota: 16.1 points per game versus 16.7 points per game. Were I able to offer even a modestly satirical preview of this game, believe me, I'd do it.
[3-0, Minnesota]
Houston v. New York Jets: If there is such a thing as an "on the cusp" 3-7 team, it may be the Houston Texans. They suffered close losses to the Giants and Bills (four points, three points), and lay claim to two--count 'em, two--wins over the Jacksonville Jaguars. David Carr, despite failing to throw a touchdown pass in his last four games, is showing that he can be a worthy starter in the NFL, especially if complemented by a not-awful offensive line, a solid running game, and a respectable defense. Oh yeah--Andre Johnson is a beast. The Jets, who followed a potentially season-defining win against the Patriots by posting a "0" against the Bears, are entering a make-or-break stretch of winnable games against Houston, Green Bay, Buffalo, and Minnesota. With division-leading New England facing those very same 9-1 Bears this week, the Jets have an opportunity to climb and create a genuine AFC East power struggle. It's a shame that they're the most boring team in the NFL.
[13-10, Houston, OT]
Oakland v. San Diego: Yes, LT may actually score half a dozen touchdowns.
[42-7, San Diego]
Chicago v. New England: Man-oh-man, a Thanksgiving weekend showdown between the league's two stingiest defenses. That's right--despite being lambasted and left for dead by pundits everywhere, the supposedly "past-it" Patriots are surrendering a mere 13.1 points per game this season, second only to Chicago's 12.0. Commentators are billing this as New England's "identity game"--a game which, if lost, will drop the Patriots from their dynastic pedestal into the common masses of the AFC. For Chicago, this is also an identity game. The Bears, who have struggled to gain credibility despite a 9-1 record, can silence scores of critics by marching into Foxboro and leaving with the spoils. Look for this to be a low-scoring affair, with touchdowns coming at a premium. And one last warning: Don't throw Belichick, Brady, and the boys under the bus just yet.
[14-10, New England]
New York Giants v. Tennessee: Eli = struggling. Eli = overrated. Giants = primed for implosion. Call this the Upset Special!
[24-17, Tennessee]
Philadelphia v. Indianapolis: Donovan McNabb's injury may end up as one of the saddest sports stories of the year. Whether you're a McNabb-lover or -hater, you can't deny the fact that the guy is as fierce and competitive as any QB in the NFL. Unfortunately, the Eagles now stand without their leader--and without any semblance of a running game. Peyton and the Colts, with the 16-0 monkey off their backs, can now get back to the business of throwing the football down everyone's throats.
[31-10, Indianapolis]
Green Bay v. Seattle: Truthfully, the big story surrounding this game will have nothing to do with the end score, nor will it have anything to do with Matt Hasselbeck returning just in time for Mike Holmgren to face his former team. The headline here is that Brett Favre will apparently make his 232nd consecutive start as the Packers' quarterback, despite suffering a nerve injury in his elbow last week . Boy, I would looove to pick the Packers in a sentimental upset. However, the game is being played in Seattle, which means it's a virtual lock for the Seahawks.
[24-14, Seattle]
Charlton v. Everton: Everton, while currently in 7th spot, trail 3rd-place Portsmouth by a mere three points. With impact players like Andy Johnson and Tim Cahill, the Toffees certainly know how to net their share of goals. Charlton, on the other hand, currently sit at the bottom of the table. With only eight points earned from thirteen matches, the Addicks are in need of a momentum-changing victory.
[2-0, Everton]
Aston Villa v. Middlesbrough: Disappointing Middlesbrough, who have yet to notch a victory on the road this season, must travel to Villa Park, where the home men have ceded only three goals in six games (4-2-0). Though they currently sit 5th in the table, Villa have lost only once in 13 overall matches (5-7-1). If they can develop a knockout punch, Martin O'neill's squad may well be a legitimate factor in the race for Champion's League spots.
[1-0, Villa]
Fulham v. Reading: Newly promoted (and surprising) Reading currently sit 8th, though they trail 4th-place Arsenal by only three points. Perennial middle-meddlers Fulham are hoping to correct the disappointing form shown in last week's 3-1 loss against Manchester City. Most notable about this game is that each team features a member of the U.S. national team! It's McBride v. Convey!
[1-1, draw]
Liverpool v. Manchester City: Perhaps second to Newcastle in terms of general disappointment, Liverpool boast an embarrassing 0-2-5 road mark, having scored only a single goal in those seven away matches. City hold an equally dismal 0-1-5 road record, having surrendered a league-worst 14 away goals. This week's match-up is at Ansfield, which surely gives Liverpool the edge. Still, Rafa Benitez must find a way to win on the road if Liverpool are to have any chance of rescuing their season. Such poor play is hardly becoming of a recent European Champion.
[2-1, Liverpool]
West Ham v. Sheffield United: Fortunately for struggling West Ham, Sheffield must travel to Upton Park. The EPL newcomers have yet to claw their way out of the relegation zone, having managed only a pair of wins thus far. Things, however, look equally bleak for West Ham. Invigorated by high-profile signings including Argentinian star Carlos Tevez, the Hammers surely figured to be far more than one point clear of the relegation zone at this juncture in the season. Alan Pardew has his work cut out for him.
[1-0, West Ham]
Bolton v. Arsenal: Expect the Gunners to ride into the Reebok Stadium on a wave of midweek Champion's League momentum. Currently 4th in the table, Arsenal must soon show whether they have what it takes to shake up the two-team race between Man. U. and Chelsea.
[3-1, Arsenal]
Newcastle v. Portsmouth: Portsmouth began the season as a fantasy owner's dream, led by scoring machine Kanu and a staunch defense anchored by rejuvenated stars David James and Sol Campbell. Although Pompey are beginning to "come back to Earth," they needn't worry about "Most Disappointing Team" front-runner Newcastle. Parker, Martins, Duff, and company have done little of note, posting a lowly eight goals in 13 matches played.
[2-0, Portsmouth]
Tottenham v. Wigan: Fresh off a season in which they impressively retained their top-flight status, Wigan are currently riding a five-match unbeaten streak, highlighted by back-to-back road victories against Fulham and Bolton. Spurs, ever the yearly pick for "Next Big Team," stand poised to star in A Tale of Two Seasons: 4-1-1 at home, 0-3-4 on the road. Look for Tottenham to try to find their goal-scoring touch this weekend at White Hart Lane.
[2-1, Tottenham]
Manchester United v. Chelsea: This is the first of what are sure to be a pair of vitally important clashes between the EPL's top two teams. While each club has suffered only a single Premiership loss, both experienced midweek 1-0 defeats in Champion's League group play (United against Celtic, Chelsea against Werder Bremen). Make no mistake: neither Sir Alex Ferguson nor Jose Mourinho will allow his team to enter this match with a hangover. Ferguson's Red Devils hungrily wish to puncture the aura that surrounds the defending champs, while Mourinho's men look to reiterate their intentions of retaining the EPL crown. It's "we're back" versus "we ain't going nowhere."
[2-2, draw]
NFL
Cincinatti v. Cleveland: While the Bengals stand at a disappointing 5-5, they remain 5th in the NFL in points scored. Indeed, Carson Palmer and crew can score with the best of 'em. Following a big win in New Orleans, the Bengals need to continue to improve their defense while remaining strong as ever on the offensive side. The Browns, on the other hand, are...the Browns. Despite my previous praise of their uniforms--and despite the fact that Braylon Edwards is becoming a stud--Cleveland is still Cleveland.
[31-10, Cincinatti]
Jacksonville v. Buffalo: The Jaguars are the NFL's most perplexing team, boasting wins over the Giants, Eagles, and Cowboys, while recording losses to the Redskins and Texans (twice). The Bills continue to ebb and flow, though they have won two of their last three games, with the one loss being a 17-16 heartbreaker against the then-undefeated Colts. In a game between two inconsistent teams such as Jacksonville and Buffalo, home-field advantage generally sways things. Look for the Bills to inch closer to the .500 mark.
[17-14, Buffalo]
Pittsburgh v. Baltimore: The wheels of the Big Ben Bandwagon have fallen off, and memories of Super Bowl XXXV are alive in Baltimore. With two difficult road games (at Cincinatti and at Kansas City) upcoming, expect Baltimore to pounce upon the defending champs in this tune-up.
[28-10, Baltimore]
New Orleans v. Atlanta: Drew Brees, coming off of a 510-yard losing performance against the Bengals, takes his Big Easy aerial attack to the Georgia Dome to meet the Falcons, losers of three straight. Meanwhile, Michael Vick will surely be looking to set his critics (including Jim Mora Sr.) straight. Each of these teams has played in its share of shootouts this season, so don't expect to see a great deal of defense in this one. Give the edge to the Saints, who won the first go-'round 23-3.
[34-24, New Orleans]
Carolina v. Washington: The Panthers are beginning to look, if only somewhat, like a team who could at least challenge for the NFC's Super Bowl spot. So long as they have a healthy Steve Smith and a decently effective running game, Carolina stands a chance to beat anyone they play. The Redskins, conversely, are...bad. The generous 4.5-point line presumably entails a small measure of home-field momentum for Washington. Heh...
[28-10, Carolina]
San Francisco v. St. Louis: Hold the presses! The 49ers sit in 2nd place in the NFC West, only one game behind defending conference champs Seattle. Despite fielding the league's second-worst scoring defense, the Niners have inched their way to a 5-5 record. Lo and behold, what better chance to break the .500 barrier than to face the freefalling Rams? (Granted, "freefalling" may be too harsh a term, as St. Louis is coming off of a difficult stretch--Seattle (twice), San Diego, Kansas City, and Carolina.) Still, all were losses, and San Francisco will try to strike while the iron is hot, using a healthy dose of Frank Gore to open up the passing game for a much-improved Alex Smith. Don't be surprised if they pull off an upset on the road.
[24-20, San Francisco]
Arizona v. Minnesota: 16.1 points per game versus 16.7 points per game. Were I able to offer even a modestly satirical preview of this game, believe me, I'd do it.
[3-0, Minnesota]
Houston v. New York Jets: If there is such a thing as an "on the cusp" 3-7 team, it may be the Houston Texans. They suffered close losses to the Giants and Bills (four points, three points), and lay claim to two--count 'em, two--wins over the Jacksonville Jaguars. David Carr, despite failing to throw a touchdown pass in his last four games, is showing that he can be a worthy starter in the NFL, especially if complemented by a not-awful offensive line, a solid running game, and a respectable defense. Oh yeah--Andre Johnson is a beast. The Jets, who followed a potentially season-defining win against the Patriots by posting a "0" against the Bears, are entering a make-or-break stretch of winnable games against Houston, Green Bay, Buffalo, and Minnesota. With division-leading New England facing those very same 9-1 Bears this week, the Jets have an opportunity to climb and create a genuine AFC East power struggle. It's a shame that they're the most boring team in the NFL.
[13-10, Houston, OT]
Oakland v. San Diego: Yes, LT may actually score half a dozen touchdowns.
[42-7, San Diego]
Chicago v. New England: Man-oh-man, a Thanksgiving weekend showdown between the league's two stingiest defenses. That's right--despite being lambasted and left for dead by pundits everywhere, the supposedly "past-it" Patriots are surrendering a mere 13.1 points per game this season, second only to Chicago's 12.0. Commentators are billing this as New England's "identity game"--a game which, if lost, will drop the Patriots from their dynastic pedestal into the common masses of the AFC. For Chicago, this is also an identity game. The Bears, who have struggled to gain credibility despite a 9-1 record, can silence scores of critics by marching into Foxboro and leaving with the spoils. Look for this to be a low-scoring affair, with touchdowns coming at a premium. And one last warning: Don't throw Belichick, Brady, and the boys under the bus just yet.
[14-10, New England]
New York Giants v. Tennessee: Eli = struggling. Eli = overrated. Giants = primed for implosion. Call this the Upset Special!
[24-17, Tennessee]
Philadelphia v. Indianapolis: Donovan McNabb's injury may end up as one of the saddest sports stories of the year. Whether you're a McNabb-lover or -hater, you can't deny the fact that the guy is as fierce and competitive as any QB in the NFL. Unfortunately, the Eagles now stand without their leader--and without any semblance of a running game. Peyton and the Colts, with the 16-0 monkey off their backs, can now get back to the business of throwing the football down everyone's throats.
[31-10, Indianapolis]
Green Bay v. Seattle: Truthfully, the big story surrounding this game will have nothing to do with the end score, nor will it have anything to do with Matt Hasselbeck returning just in time for Mike Holmgren to face his former team. The headline here is that Brett Favre will apparently make his 232nd consecutive start as the Packers' quarterback, despite suffering a nerve injury in his elbow last week . Boy, I would looove to pick the Packers in a sentimental upset. However, the game is being played in Seattle, which means it's a virtual lock for the Seahawks.
[24-14, Seattle]
11.23.2006
Turkey Day
Today, I'm not going to complain about the fact that the Chiefs-Broncos game is being aired on the NFL Network. I'm not going to reiterate the across-the-board importance of Gonzaga's jump from mid-major to elite basketball power (Boy, did they shut down UNC's Tyler Hansbrough or what?). No, today I'm not even going to rail against the ridiculous, starry-eyed wave of Dallas Cowboy/Tony Romo over-hype that seems to be sweeping the sports nation.
Instead, I simply say...Happy Thanksgiving.
Instead, I simply say...Happy Thanksgiving.
11.22.2006
Are You Ready For Some Football?
Aaah, late November. A perfect season for succulent turkey, plenty-sweet desserts, and, of course, football. That's right--it's that time of year during which epic 11-versus-11 wars are waged; when millions of fans the world over are preparing to wave their banners of support; when electric offenses and ironclad defenses suit up and step onto turf-covered battlefields.
Indeed, the Thanksgiving season is synonymous with football--or, as you may know it better, soccer.
While millions of American ready themselves for a weekend full of NCAA and NFL pigskin, more millions across the world are gearing up for a make-or-break stretch of footie. Only yesterday, Gordan Strachan and his Celtic men achieved a historic Champion's League victory over legendary Manchester United. The 1-0 win, which came by virtue of a stunning 81st-minute free-kick from Shunsuke Nakamura, vaulted the Glasgow club into the knockout stages (Final 16) of the UEFA Champion's League for the first time in its history. Lest you doubt the popularity and complete infusion of "soccer" in European culture, look no further than the tens of thousands of fans who stood long after Celtic's victory crooning "You'll Never Walk Alone." Try as you may, but you'll not be able to gaze upon such a stirring event without feeling a sweeping sense of nostalgia, regardless of your national and/or geographical loyalties.
Whilst living and teaching ESL in Suzhou, China, I met an older Glaswegian gentleman at a bar. When I asked him whether he "cheered" for Celtic or same-city rival Rangers, his response was priceless: "Celtic--and I don't 'cheer' far 'em, I bleeeeed far 'em." Unfortunately, the majority of Americans continually refuse to embrace or appreciate this unequalled spirit, choosing to dismiss soccer as a dull, highlight-less game. Nonetheless, for those who love European football--for those who understand how it is embedded into Europeans' very identity--this is a stellar time of year.
The EPL (English Premier League) season is 1/3 complete. This is the point in the schedule when leads can be made insurmountable and significant deficits can be erased. Having played 13 of 38 games, teams still have an opportunity to monitor-and-adjust and hopefully climb the table; by the time that 2/3 of the season is in the books, though, fates will be largely sealed. Indeed, it's "movin' time."
On Sunday, only five days after an epic loss to Celtic, the Red Devils of Manchester United must play host to defending EPL champions and current second-place squad Chelsea. Separated by a mere three points (one win), Man. U. and Chelsea appear primed for a classic two-team title race. Other potential contenders such as Portsmouth, Arsenal, and Aston Villa continue to posture for a spot in next year's Champion's League, an honor awarded to the EPL's top four finishers. And, on the opposite end of the spectrum, bottom-dwellers like Newcastle and Charlton are clawing for their top-flight lives. (The three teams with the fewest points at season's end will be relegated, i.e. demoted to a lower division.)
With Champion's League and relegation, we see two fundamental facets of European football that distinguish it (for the better) from American sports--and that render this a particularly compelling time of year. Qualification for the Champion's League is open to teams from every expanse of Europe, from virtually every league in every nation. Teams who make it into one of eight four-team groups must finish either first or second within their group in order to advance to the sixteen-team knockout tournament. At competition's end, the champions can truly claim to be masters of Europe, having risen above hundreds and hundreds of other clubs to attain the title.
While Champion's League represents a yearly gauntlet that rewards both own-league and European success, relegation stands as the ultimate shake-up mechanism. Each year the bottom three teams in the EPL, for example, are demoted--yes, kicked out!--from the top flight. Only by finishing in the top three in the Championship division will they be allowed to re-enter the Premiership. Imagine, if you will, an NFL or NBA team being relegated from the league as a result of poor performance, or a minor-league baseball team being given the opportunity to ascend to the Majors. Such possibilities would spice things up, no?
Yes, indeed, this is a wonderful time of year. Paths to national and European glory are being carved, and top-tier reputations are in jeopardy. On mud-mangled pitches in storied stadiums, warriors will fight in earnest to leave their marks on the world's game.
I ask: Are you ready for some football?
Indeed, the Thanksgiving season is synonymous with football--or, as you may know it better, soccer.
While millions of American ready themselves for a weekend full of NCAA and NFL pigskin, more millions across the world are gearing up for a make-or-break stretch of footie. Only yesterday, Gordan Strachan and his Celtic men achieved a historic Champion's League victory over legendary Manchester United. The 1-0 win, which came by virtue of a stunning 81st-minute free-kick from Shunsuke Nakamura, vaulted the Glasgow club into the knockout stages (Final 16) of the UEFA Champion's League for the first time in its history. Lest you doubt the popularity and complete infusion of "soccer" in European culture, look no further than the tens of thousands of fans who stood long after Celtic's victory crooning "You'll Never Walk Alone." Try as you may, but you'll not be able to gaze upon such a stirring event without feeling a sweeping sense of nostalgia, regardless of your national and/or geographical loyalties.
Whilst living and teaching ESL in Suzhou, China, I met an older Glaswegian gentleman at a bar. When I asked him whether he "cheered" for Celtic or same-city rival Rangers, his response was priceless: "Celtic--and I don't 'cheer' far 'em, I bleeeeed far 'em." Unfortunately, the majority of Americans continually refuse to embrace or appreciate this unequalled spirit, choosing to dismiss soccer as a dull, highlight-less game. Nonetheless, for those who love European football--for those who understand how it is embedded into Europeans' very identity--this is a stellar time of year.
The EPL (English Premier League) season is 1/3 complete. This is the point in the schedule when leads can be made insurmountable and significant deficits can be erased. Having played 13 of 38 games, teams still have an opportunity to monitor-and-adjust and hopefully climb the table; by the time that 2/3 of the season is in the books, though, fates will be largely sealed. Indeed, it's "movin' time."
On Sunday, only five days after an epic loss to Celtic, the Red Devils of Manchester United must play host to defending EPL champions and current second-place squad Chelsea. Separated by a mere three points (one win), Man. U. and Chelsea appear primed for a classic two-team title race. Other potential contenders such as Portsmouth, Arsenal, and Aston Villa continue to posture for a spot in next year's Champion's League, an honor awarded to the EPL's top four finishers. And, on the opposite end of the spectrum, bottom-dwellers like Newcastle and Charlton are clawing for their top-flight lives. (The three teams with the fewest points at season's end will be relegated, i.e. demoted to a lower division.)
With Champion's League and relegation, we see two fundamental facets of European football that distinguish it (for the better) from American sports--and that render this a particularly compelling time of year. Qualification for the Champion's League is open to teams from every expanse of Europe, from virtually every league in every nation. Teams who make it into one of eight four-team groups must finish either first or second within their group in order to advance to the sixteen-team knockout tournament. At competition's end, the champions can truly claim to be masters of Europe, having risen above hundreds and hundreds of other clubs to attain the title.
While Champion's League represents a yearly gauntlet that rewards both own-league and European success, relegation stands as the ultimate shake-up mechanism. Each year the bottom three teams in the EPL, for example, are demoted--yes, kicked out!--from the top flight. Only by finishing in the top three in the Championship division will they be allowed to re-enter the Premiership. Imagine, if you will, an NFL or NBA team being relegated from the league as a result of poor performance, or a minor-league baseball team being given the opportunity to ascend to the Majors. Such possibilities would spice things up, no?
Yes, indeed, this is a wonderful time of year. Paths to national and European glory are being carved, and top-tier reputations are in jeopardy. On mud-mangled pitches in storied stadiums, warriors will fight in earnest to leave their marks on the world's game.
I ask: Are you ready for some football?
11.21.2006
Manning Up
Now that Philip Rivers is beginning to display his considerable quarterbacking abilities with the red-hot San Diego Chargers, and with the New York Giants looking more mediocre by the week, the "Eli question" is being raised anew. Little Manning's most recent Monday-night meltdown in Jacksonville did little to silence the debate. Did the Giants make a mistake in choosing Manning instead of Rivers (or Roethlisberger)? Do we place unfair expectations on Manning solely because of his last name? Should we simply sit back and allow Eli to mature at a "reasonable" rate?
Well...maybe, no, and absolutely not.
Allow me to explain.
Did the Giants make a mistake in choosing Manning instead of Rivers (or Roethlisberger)?
Of all the common Eli-related questions, this one requires the most patience to answer. To be sure, Roethlisberger (version 2k5) and Rivers appear primed for top-tier success. Big Ben, despite his recent struggles, has already secured a Ring; Rivers, whose Chargers currently look like the best team in the National Football League, looks like he may one day join the Jordanesque ranks of uh-oh draft-day lore. Nonetheless, these three QBs still stand in the early stages of their careers, having only been in the league for some 2 1/2 years. Hence, I feel that we should reserve opinion on this particular question until 2010 or so. Only then will we be able to assess a substantial body of work.
Do we place unfair expectations on Manning solely because of his last name?
The answer to this question is simple: no. Numerous commentators, including "Around the Horn" contributor Jim Armstrong, have asserted that we'd view Eli much less harshly were his name John Doe. Along this view, we unreasonably "expect" Eli to carry on the genetic Manning legend.
Such logic is terribly flawed. If Eli Manning were John Doe or Mo Schmoe, we wouldn't be holding these debates; if Eli Manning were not Eli Manning, he wouldn't be the starting QB for the New York Giants. Other successful college quarterbacks of recent note--e.g., Tim Couch, Joey Harrington, and Rex Grossman--have entered the NFL and shown that their pro legacies may not live up to their NCAA prologues. Nonetheless, we do not cry in outrage. We do not call for their heads.
The obvious point to be made here is that Eli was a celebrated #1 overall draft pick--by far the most highly touted golden boy of his or any recent class. My follow-up point is this: Eli's position was influenced almost primarily by his last name. His college stats were spectacular, but so were Couch's, Harrington's, and Grossman's. The key motivation for our shock at Eli's poor play is simple: We expected him to be Peyton Lite. We expected him to climb onto the nation's biggest stage in the nation's biggest sport and immediately become a star. Now, the prospect of Eli spending his career as a slightly above-average NFL quarterback has left us befuddled.
Perhaps Eli will indeed turn out to be a top-5 QB at some point down the road, thus justifying the pre-draft circus that followed him. No one knows what the future may hold. As for our current concern--it's wholly justified. We don't place "unfair" expectations on Eli simply because his last name is Manning. Rather, Eli Manning is who he is--is where he is--largely because his last name is Manning. There is, as they (sort of) say, no separating the Manning from the myth; we set the bar, and there's no lowering it now. Eli's name got him to where he is. The time for "objective" expectations has long since passed.
Should we simply sit back and allow Eli to mature at a reasonable rate?
See previous question/answer.
Well...maybe, no, and absolutely not.
Allow me to explain.
Did the Giants make a mistake in choosing Manning instead of Rivers (or Roethlisberger)?
Of all the common Eli-related questions, this one requires the most patience to answer. To be sure, Roethlisberger (version 2k5) and Rivers appear primed for top-tier success. Big Ben, despite his recent struggles, has already secured a Ring; Rivers, whose Chargers currently look like the best team in the National Football League, looks like he may one day join the Jordanesque ranks of uh-oh draft-day lore. Nonetheless, these three QBs still stand in the early stages of their careers, having only been in the league for some 2 1/2 years. Hence, I feel that we should reserve opinion on this particular question until 2010 or so. Only then will we be able to assess a substantial body of work.
Do we place unfair expectations on Manning solely because of his last name?
The answer to this question is simple: no. Numerous commentators, including "Around the Horn" contributor Jim Armstrong, have asserted that we'd view Eli much less harshly were his name John Doe. Along this view, we unreasonably "expect" Eli to carry on the genetic Manning legend.
Such logic is terribly flawed. If Eli Manning were John Doe or Mo Schmoe, we wouldn't be holding these debates; if Eli Manning were not Eli Manning, he wouldn't be the starting QB for the New York Giants. Other successful college quarterbacks of recent note--e.g., Tim Couch, Joey Harrington, and Rex Grossman--have entered the NFL and shown that their pro legacies may not live up to their NCAA prologues. Nonetheless, we do not cry in outrage. We do not call for their heads.
The obvious point to be made here is that Eli was a celebrated #1 overall draft pick--by far the most highly touted golden boy of his or any recent class. My follow-up point is this: Eli's position was influenced almost primarily by his last name. His college stats were spectacular, but so were Couch's, Harrington's, and Grossman's. The key motivation for our shock at Eli's poor play is simple: We expected him to be Peyton Lite. We expected him to climb onto the nation's biggest stage in the nation's biggest sport and immediately become a star. Now, the prospect of Eli spending his career as a slightly above-average NFL quarterback has left us befuddled.
Perhaps Eli will indeed turn out to be a top-5 QB at some point down the road, thus justifying the pre-draft circus that followed him. No one knows what the future may hold. As for our current concern--it's wholly justified. We don't place "unfair" expectations on Eli simply because his last name is Manning. Rather, Eli Manning is who he is--is where he is--largely because his last name is Manning. There is, as they (sort of) say, no separating the Manning from the myth; we set the bar, and there's no lowering it now. Eli's name got him to where he is. The time for "objective" expectations has long since passed.
Should we simply sit back and allow Eli to mature at a reasonable rate?
See previous question/answer.
Boise Among Men?
Amidst the ongoing flurry of rematch- and playoff-related BCS debates, there are countless college football what-if's to ponder. One of the most interesting stories--that of the Boise State Broncos--has gone largely untold, or more accurately, unimagined.
We're all quite familiar with the "Smurf turf" that covers Boise's one-of-a-kind home field. We're also well familiar with the oft-replicated David-versus-Goliath(s) storyline: a mid-major team posts an impressive record but is denied national championship consideration due to a weak schedule. (See Alex Smith and Utah, 2004). Smith's Utah team did earn the chance to play in a BCS bowl, but garnered little support for a shot at the Big One.
Here we see one of the key differences between college football and, say, college basketball. The NCAA basketball tournament is a mid-major team's dream. Consider Gonzaga, a program that came virtually out of nowhere and established itself as a perennial March contender. Initially, fans clamoured that the Zags were "overrated," that they would soon show themselves to be nothing more than one-and-done pretenders. Fortunately for Gonzaga (and for the fans who enjoy watching them inject a sense of freshness into the college basketball scene), they utilized their initial tournament opportunities, and have since strode into the upper echelon of March powers.
The key here: Gonzaga (or George Mason, UAB, et. al.) was offered a seat at the table. The very idea of a tournament is that no worthy team--of which we select some 65 annually in college basketball--is denied a chance, no matter how slight, to play for the national title. If it's true that Team A is nothing more than a non-major weakling, then this will manifest itself when they square off against a "traditional" powerhouse. In other words, they still PLAY THE GAME. Presumptions and punditry are thrown out the window in favor of--gasp--competition.
Of course, the adoption of such a clear-cut process has eluded college football (For an exploration of the reasons behind this, visit my pal Mike's blog at http://mao-musings.blogspot.com/). On the collegiate gridiron, reputations and opinions stem not solely from on-field play, but also from memories and images of yesteryear. Woven into our national football fabric are visions of Big Ten winters, with Woody and Bo duking it out; of the Fighting Irish suiting up for their yearly Trojan War; of smash-mouth Big 12 grudge matches; and of classic intra-Florida showdowns. When we see, for example, this year's Notre Dame team, we don't recognize it as consisting of an above-average offense combined with a so-so defense. Rather, we see Quinn as Montana, Weis as Rockne--a constellation of faded Irish glory. When we consider USC's upcoming game against UCLA, we paint it as an always-difficult "rivalry game" (which supposedly adds to the perceived allure of USC's schedule strength), rather than as a game that the would-be #2 team in the country should win by 30 points.
No, there isn't yet a thread for Boise in this fabric. Unlike the Gonzagas of the basketball world, Boise State cannot immediately play its way into the national consciousness. What, then, are they to do? A traditional powerhouse from a historic conference has the luxury of citing "reputation." Consider this year's Big 10, which features three exceptionally strong teams--Ohio State, Michigan, and Wisconsin--but is otherwise overrated more heavily than any sports entity in America. For instance, take away Michigan's wins over ND and Wisconsin. What other worthy teams have they beaten? Penn State? Michigan State? Indeed, the Big 10 has stood upon fraudulent legs throughout this entire season, being rescued only by its eye-popping top-heaviness.
Boise, oh Boise, is left to navigate a much tougher passage. They are left to play in a weak conference, and their non-conference strength-of-schedule prospects continue to be tenuous. What major college power would be willing to schedule a non-conference game against Boise State early on in the season? Texas? USC? Ohio State? Michigan? These teams know that a loss in such a game would, effectively speaking, end their national title hopes. Despite the fact that Boise is a perennial statistical juggernaut, writers would nonetheless point to the fact that a contender lost to...Boise State!
In order to gain a seat at football's hallowed table, Boise will likely have to remain undefeated for an entire season, beat a major-conference team in a BCS bowl, and then replicate the feat the following year (or years) to show that they are indeed legitimate. Even then, voters may be hesitant to put the Smurfs in the money-grubbing BCS Championship Game.
After all, wouldn't we rather witness a finale filled with ghosts?
We're all quite familiar with the "Smurf turf" that covers Boise's one-of-a-kind home field. We're also well familiar with the oft-replicated David-versus-Goliath(s) storyline: a mid-major team posts an impressive record but is denied national championship consideration due to a weak schedule. (See Alex Smith and Utah, 2004). Smith's Utah team did earn the chance to play in a BCS bowl, but garnered little support for a shot at the Big One.
Here we see one of the key differences between college football and, say, college basketball. The NCAA basketball tournament is a mid-major team's dream. Consider Gonzaga, a program that came virtually out of nowhere and established itself as a perennial March contender. Initially, fans clamoured that the Zags were "overrated," that they would soon show themselves to be nothing more than one-and-done pretenders. Fortunately for Gonzaga (and for the fans who enjoy watching them inject a sense of freshness into the college basketball scene), they utilized their initial tournament opportunities, and have since strode into the upper echelon of March powers.
The key here: Gonzaga (or George Mason, UAB, et. al.) was offered a seat at the table. The very idea of a tournament is that no worthy team--of which we select some 65 annually in college basketball--is denied a chance, no matter how slight, to play for the national title. If it's true that Team A is nothing more than a non-major weakling, then this will manifest itself when they square off against a "traditional" powerhouse. In other words, they still PLAY THE GAME. Presumptions and punditry are thrown out the window in favor of--gasp--competition.
Of course, the adoption of such a clear-cut process has eluded college football (For an exploration of the reasons behind this, visit my pal Mike's blog at http://mao-musings.blogspot.com/). On the collegiate gridiron, reputations and opinions stem not solely from on-field play, but also from memories and images of yesteryear. Woven into our national football fabric are visions of Big Ten winters, with Woody and Bo duking it out; of the Fighting Irish suiting up for their yearly Trojan War; of smash-mouth Big 12 grudge matches; and of classic intra-Florida showdowns. When we see, for example, this year's Notre Dame team, we don't recognize it as consisting of an above-average offense combined with a so-so defense. Rather, we see Quinn as Montana, Weis as Rockne--a constellation of faded Irish glory. When we consider USC's upcoming game against UCLA, we paint it as an always-difficult "rivalry game" (which supposedly adds to the perceived allure of USC's schedule strength), rather than as a game that the would-be #2 team in the country should win by 30 points.
No, there isn't yet a thread for Boise in this fabric. Unlike the Gonzagas of the basketball world, Boise State cannot immediately play its way into the national consciousness. What, then, are they to do? A traditional powerhouse from a historic conference has the luxury of citing "reputation." Consider this year's Big 10, which features three exceptionally strong teams--Ohio State, Michigan, and Wisconsin--but is otherwise overrated more heavily than any sports entity in America. For instance, take away Michigan's wins over ND and Wisconsin. What other worthy teams have they beaten? Penn State? Michigan State? Indeed, the Big 10 has stood upon fraudulent legs throughout this entire season, being rescued only by its eye-popping top-heaviness.
Boise, oh Boise, is left to navigate a much tougher passage. They are left to play in a weak conference, and their non-conference strength-of-schedule prospects continue to be tenuous. What major college power would be willing to schedule a non-conference game against Boise State early on in the season? Texas? USC? Ohio State? Michigan? These teams know that a loss in such a game would, effectively speaking, end their national title hopes. Despite the fact that Boise is a perennial statistical juggernaut, writers would nonetheless point to the fact that a contender lost to...Boise State!
In order to gain a seat at football's hallowed table, Boise will likely have to remain undefeated for an entire season, beat a major-conference team in a BCS bowl, and then replicate the feat the following year (or years) to show that they are indeed legitimate. Even then, voters may be hesitant to put the Smurfs in the money-grubbing BCS Championship Game.
After all, wouldn't we rather witness a finale filled with ghosts?
11.20.2006
Uniform-ity
On Friday I presumed that I'd spend this chilly Monday morning penning an ill-spirited polemic against both the BCS and the growing army of Ohio State-Michigan rematch supporters. However, the so-called "Game of the Millennium" turned out to be...well...almost exactly that. Trailing last year's Texas-USC epic only slightly, this weekend's game left me utterly perplexed as to who should be #2, #3, and so on.
Thus, I'm going to withhold my rankings for now and instead use today's space to address a completely unrelated topic: uniforms. Ever since my good friend Mike began following (and occasionally contributing to) the UniWatch blog, I've given a great deal of thought to the question, "What makes a good football uniform?" Time and time again, I find myself reaching the same answers: simplicity (in both color and template) and timelessness.
Here are my (currently worn) Top 5 college and Top 3 pro football uniforms:
College
5. Ohio State: As you'll discover in the forthcoming rankings, I'm a sucker for solid-colored, logo-less helmets. The Buckeyes' classic silver, combined with a simplistic shirt (whether home-field red or on-the-road white), makes for a sharp look.
4. Notre Dame: Gold helmets. Nameless jerseys. Recognizable from anywhere. Enough said.
3. University of Texas: While I don't care for ornate and/or cartoonish logos, I enjoy a simple, muted icon. The burnt-orange longhorn, which is set against an otherwise all-white helmet, provides a strong complement to both the burnt-orange-on-white home uniform and the white-on-white road version. Hook 'em horns.
2. Penn State: I flip-flopped on my #1 and #2 selections several times before ultimately leaving Penn State as runner-up. The Nittany Lions' get-up is the epitome of class. The road uniforms are practically pristine, with the lone (navy blue) color coming from a single helmet stripe and the numbers on the shirts; the home uniforms, which are even sharper, include a blue shirt. Undoubtedly this uniform is anchored by the seemingly boring yet singularly appealing white helmet.
1. Alabama: No logo. Basic colors--crimson and white. And, the kicker: numbers on the helmets! If every team adopted this uniform template with their own school colors, I would not argue. Best in class...Roll Tide.
Pro
3. San Diego Chargers: Two words: lightning bolts.
2. Chicago Bears: The combination of the legendary 'C', the orange-ish trim, and the stylish socks render this one of the most classic uniforms in all of sports.
1. Cleveland Browns: The Browns demand respect for maintaining the league's only logo-less helmet. The home uniform--solid brown shirt and orange helmet--exudes the toughness and cold-weather feel of the old AFC Central division. (You'll have no trouble seeing these guys in the snow.) Indeed, this uniform is one of the most underrated in the sports world.
Thus, I'm going to withhold my rankings for now and instead use today's space to address a completely unrelated topic: uniforms. Ever since my good friend Mike began following (and occasionally contributing to) the UniWatch blog, I've given a great deal of thought to the question, "What makes a good football uniform?" Time and time again, I find myself reaching the same answers: simplicity (in both color and template) and timelessness.
Here are my (currently worn) Top 5 college and Top 3 pro football uniforms:
College
5. Ohio State: As you'll discover in the forthcoming rankings, I'm a sucker for solid-colored, logo-less helmets. The Buckeyes' classic silver, combined with a simplistic shirt (whether home-field red or on-the-road white), makes for a sharp look.
4. Notre Dame: Gold helmets. Nameless jerseys. Recognizable from anywhere. Enough said.
3. University of Texas: While I don't care for ornate and/or cartoonish logos, I enjoy a simple, muted icon. The burnt-orange longhorn, which is set against an otherwise all-white helmet, provides a strong complement to both the burnt-orange-on-white home uniform and the white-on-white road version. Hook 'em horns.
2. Penn State: I flip-flopped on my #1 and #2 selections several times before ultimately leaving Penn State as runner-up. The Nittany Lions' get-up is the epitome of class. The road uniforms are practically pristine, with the lone (navy blue) color coming from a single helmet stripe and the numbers on the shirts; the home uniforms, which are even sharper, include a blue shirt. Undoubtedly this uniform is anchored by the seemingly boring yet singularly appealing white helmet.
1. Alabama: No logo. Basic colors--crimson and white. And, the kicker: numbers on the helmets! If every team adopted this uniform template with their own school colors, I would not argue. Best in class...Roll Tide.
Pro
3. San Diego Chargers: Two words: lightning bolts.
2. Chicago Bears: The combination of the legendary 'C', the orange-ish trim, and the stylish socks render this one of the most classic uniforms in all of sports.
1. Cleveland Browns: The Browns demand respect for maintaining the league's only logo-less helmet. The home uniform--solid brown shirt and orange helmet--exudes the toughness and cold-weather feel of the old AFC Central division. (You'll have no trouble seeing these guys in the snow.) Indeed, this uniform is one of the most underrated in the sports world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)